The Gospel Spotlight

(Electronic Edition)


(Romans 1:16)

“For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God to salvation . . . .”


May, 2002 Vol. 1 - No. 3


 

The Gospel Spotlight is a

publication of the Sixty Fifth St. church of Christ

7115 West Sixty Fifth St.

P.O. Box 19062

Little Rock AR 72219-1062

 

Editor and Evangelist

Don McClain - donmccla@msn.com


Contents:

Hold Fast The Pattern - Keith Sharp

Can We Have Unity - George DeHoff

The Word - R.H. Bunting

From My EMail In Box - Daycare, Eating in the church, Orphan homes

 

 


Hold Fast The Pattern

Keith Sharp

Introduction

Several years ago I arranged to have a study with a preacher in another church of Christ in the town where I lived about differences we had on the subject of institutionalism. He admitted he had not studied the subject much, but he wanted me to read a tract written by Athens Clay Pullias entitled "Where There Is No Pattern." The thesis of this brochure was that there is no New Testament pattern in the area of our disagreement, and, thus, we are free to do as we please without constraints from divine law. Our disagreement involved the organization and work of the church. If the tract is correct, there is no divine pattern for the organization and work of the church!

For a generation some brethren have cried, "We do lots of things without Bible authority!" In the last several years some have followed this plea to its logical conclusion. One brother claimed of the New Testament:

"Nowhere, nowhere, do I find a consistent diagram or blueprint of what life should be or what the church should be."

Another declared:

"I am willing to admit that I do not have faith in the binding nature of Divine Revelation."

This raises the question, Is the New Testament a binding pattern for people today?

Paul Says It Is

The apostle Paul plainly stated that the New Testament is a pattern. He commanded:

"Hold fast the pattern of sound words which you have heard from me, in faith and love which are in Christ Jesus" (2 Timothy 1:13).

The author of Hebrews, in comparing the Old and New Testaments, appealed to the example of the construction of the tabernacle by Moses. The Lord commanded Moses, "See that you make all things according to the pattern shown you on the mountain" (Hebrews 8:5; cf. Exodus 25:40; also vv. 8-9). The Lord instructed Moses to build the tabernacle according to the divine pattern revealed on Mt. Sinai. Moses did just that (Exodus 39:42-43). As the result, "the glory of the Lord filled the tabernacle" (Exodus 40:34-35). This is a "copy and shadow of the heavenly things" for us (Hebrews 8:5). Just as the tabernacle and all the service pertaining to it were set up according to the pattern made known through Moses, the New Testament church and all that pertains to it are ordered by the pattern revealed through Christ.

What the Pattern Is

The apostle even revealed what the divine pattern is. He described it as "the pattern of sound words which you have heard from me" (2 Timothy 1:13).

The New Testament pattern is composed of "sound words." The term "sound" means "to be well, to be in good health.... true and incorrupt doctrine" (Thayer. 634). Just as nutritious food is conducive to a sound body, even so "true and incorrupt doctrine" builds a healthy spirit. True doctrine is that which comes from God (John 17:17; Romans 3:3-4). But it must also be "incorrupt." Just as a small amount of deadly poison in otherwise healthful food can be fatal, a little human doctrine mixed with the doctrine of Christ is deadly to the soul (Galatians 1:6-9).

This pattern is composed of the "words which you have heard from me" (Paul). Since Paul was an apostle, the things he taught came through the Holy Spirit from Christ (Ephesians 3:1-6).

Therefore, the New Testament pattern on any subject is composed of everything the New Testament teaches on that subject.

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness,"that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:16-17).

If we find everything the New Testament teaches about salvation, that is the divine pattern on salvation. The same principle is likewise true of the family, obligations to civil government, righteousness in business relationships, responsibilities to our neighbors, holy living, worship, organization of the church, work of the church, or any other subject which pertains to the salvation of one’s soul.

Responsibility to the Pattern

The apostle also made known our responsibility to this pattern. He commanded, "Hold fast the pattern of sound words." The phrase "Hold fast" means "keep" (Thayer. 266) or "steadfast adherence to" (Vine. 2:223). Just as Moses made "all things according to the pattern" and just as Noah built the ark "according to all that God commanded him" (Genesis 6:22; cf. vv. 14-16), so we must follow the divine pattern found in the New Testament in all we do (Colossians 3:17). To act in disregard of the New Testament pattern is to leave God (2 John 9-11).

Attitudes

The beloved apostle even informed us of the attitudes we must maintain toward the divine blueprint. He commanded us to follow it "in faith and love."

Since faith comes from hearing the word of God (Romans 10:17), in order to do things by faith, we must do those things and only those things that are authorized in the New Testament. Those whose lives are pleasing to God "walk by faith" (2 Corinthians 5:7). If we practice and teach things not authorized by the Lord in His word, we are not walking by faith, and our lives are displeasing to God.

Further, we are to exercise love in holding fast this pattern. We must always speak and practice truth, but it must be done in love (cf. Ephesians 4:15). Love of the truth demands we preach and practice truth. Love of God requires our obedience to Him (1 John 5:3). Love of our brothers and sisters in Christ compels us to seek their good in all we do (1 John 3:16-18) and to never place a stumbling block before them to cause them to sin (1 John 2:10).

Conclusion

The division that exists among Christians is tragic (cf. John 17:20-21; 1 Corinthians 3:1-3). If all would lay aside opinions and creeds and determine to believe, preach, and practice the pattern of sound words, the doctrine of Christ, we would all be one (1 Corinthians 1:10). Brother, sister, it must begin with you and me. Will you not determine to hold fast the pattern of sound words?

Meditate on These Things - April 29, 2002

Works Cited

Thayer, Joseph H., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament.

Vine, W.E., An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words.


Can We Have Unity

George DeHoff

I took a package to the post office at Murfreesboro and had the clerk weigh it. He consulted his map to find the zone to which it was going. He turned to his guidebook and told me th amount of the postage. I took the same package to our neighboring town of Woodbury and went into the post office. The clerk gave me the amount of the postage -- and it was the same. This same package I then took to a little country post office in the back of a store in one of our rural districts. There the post master weighed it. With some degree of slowness -- for he was an uneducated man -- he consulted his postal rate book and came up with the same answer. These postal employees had not met in convention and decided to charge me a certain amount for the mailing of this package.

They probably did not know one another. THEY ALL HAD ON OFFICIAL GUIDE BOOK AND WENT BY IT. They had unity. As long as men insist on using their own creeds and opinions in religion, we will have division.

WHEN WE ARE WILLING TO USE THE OFFICIAL GUIDE BOOK -- THE BIBLE -- WE WILL HAVE UNITY. (Let me say, just here, that these postal workers in these different cities had to abide by the postal guidebook or they could not be postal workers. Neither can we be true Christians unless we abide by the Bible, JWS).

----------George DeHoff, Texas Bible Banner.


 The Word

R.H. Bunting

The authority in the religion of Christ is the word of Christ. Paul wrote, "If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord." (1 Cor. 14:37). By the word "commandments", the apostle shows that the word he wrote was authoritative.

The phrase, "of the Lord", denotes supreme authority. The authority of the New Testa- ment is emphasized when we remember it grants unto us "all things that pertain unto life and godliness." (2 Pet. 1:3). Realizing the New Testament is authoritative, faithful children of God have always pleaded with people to unite upon God's Word.

Another fact I want us to notice is that one must respect the SILENCE of the will of Christ. One must abide (stay or remain) in the doctrine of Christ, and the way that is done is to remain silent where the Bible is silent. John declared, "Whosoever trans- gresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son." (2 Jno. 9,10).

When one sees "no harm" in going beyond the doctrine of Christ in matters of religion he is show- ing a lack of respect for God's Word. The statement of the apostles on circumcision points out the necessity of respecting the silence of the Scriptures. "We gave no such commandment," declares the apostles of Christ. Circumcision was not bound upon the Gentiles, and the simple reason given by the apostles was "no such command- ment." The silence of the New Testament is to be respected.

Can you show that your religious actions are authorized in the Scriptures, or do you use the lame excuse, "the Bible does not say not to"? Read 2 Jno. 9 again.

-R.H. Bunting in Bloomington, Indiana Bulletin.


From My EMail In Box

Being subscribed to several group email list I often come across posts that catch my attention. I generally fight off the urge to respond and get involved in group discussions, but. . . . . One of the lists to which I am subscribed, "The Gospel Preacher List" had several post this past week to which I just couldn't resist the urge to respond. One discussion centered around a church of Christ providing a "Day Care," and another "How to deal with a young man who didn't believe in 'eating in the building' and the 'church support of nursing homes'." The emails received will be in italics with my responses following.

Recently I was in communication with a congregation that offers "DayCare". . . . . I would be interested in others response.

One responded - "This sounds like a great program to teach children and influence their parents." WTH

To which another responded - "Book, chapter and verse please!" Art Loeber

To which James 4:17 was given to support the idea by Randy Bowling of Byron, GA.

My response:

James 4:17 deals with individual responsibility. "Let HIM who knows to do good . . ." - NOT that the church cannot do "GOOD" - but we MUST realize that in order for a thing pertaining to the work of the church to be "GOOD" it MUST BE an AUTHORIZED work for the church to be engaged in (Col 3:17, 1 Thes 5:21). Individuals may engage in many things which the church cannot! To blur the distinction between individual and corporate engagement is to open up the function of the church to every WORTHY secular activity! . . . If the church runs a daycare and such a work is authorized, then every level and form of secular education and social involvement is also authorized. The only thing restraining the church would be the preference of which secular activity to engage in and/or financial limitations.

We should ever strive to keep the church pure from secularism in both the areas of work and worship, for the church is not a secular institution, but rather a spiritual body called to carry out a spiritual mission, (1 Peter 2:5). Every secular burden we place on the church we hinder it in fulfilling its true purpose . . .such a burden is not a "GOOD" work, (see 1 Timothy 5:16). To bring social engagement, recreational activities, and secular entertainment into the church is to pollute the church - (Lev. 10:1,2; 1 Tim 3:15).

Sincerely, Don McClain


After my reply several questions were posted to the list to which I replied . . . The questions appear in italics and my response follows . .

The church is the name of those who are called by God through the gospel
Therefore individual Christians working together to do "good" do it as representative of the church

Would you not agree that what I do as a representative of the church is different from what the church does "AS A CHURCH?" For example . . Voting - Attending sporting events - Recreational activities - Secular education, etc.

Would it then be allowed for a group of Christians to open a daycare / Christian school and rent or use the facilities that the entire community of Christians helped to build or purchase (the building)?

A group of concerned Christians may act apart from using money taken out of the treasury . . . . The question is and should be - "Is secular education or providing social services an authorized work of the church?"

The daycare / school could be under the oversight of board of directors made up of those concerned Christians.
Would it be different if they were to purchase or separate facility.

To act as a group of individuals in such endeavors can again be done without involving the local church! The church is bound by the scriptures to "teach the word," not Mathematics, English, and Science. Just as the church has no authority to exercise control in the realm of secular government it has no authority to educate the populace or even its own members in the realm of secular education. Its mission is spiritual, not secular. In order for the church to provide a place and oversight for a work, the work itself must first be authorized.

Should Christians be involved in daycare or schools or should we allow the humanistic education associations decide what children are taught?

I have one son graduating from a public school this year and another in the 8th grade . . . The key is to BE INVOLVED as a Christian . . know what my children are taught - participate in the learning process and iin all extra curricular activities - This is a personal obligation - I do not have to burden the church with the secular education of my child, nor should I!

What does expedience demand?

In order for a thing to be expedient it must first be lawful. The new cart David built to transport the Ark to Jerusalem I'm sure was designed to be an expedient to do a good thing . . . however God had specified the mode of transporting the Ark. (1 Chr. 13:4,7; 15:2,13). The question again is - is the church authorized to engage in secular education or provide social programs?

Should everyone Homeschool?

That is an option, but I don't think that it is the best for everyone . . . It largely depends on where one lives - the schools here in the state of Arkansas generally speaking, are very conservative. The obligation of secular education falls upon the parent - not the church. Maybe there are members of the church that can help . . . . utilize that aide, but keep our hands out of the treasury when it comes to our children's secular education.

Should we tell our young parents to send their children to worldly or denominational preschools because we do not have them?

An argument in favor of an unauthorized thing cannot be made based upon what others are doing. We should tell them that the church has an obligation to teach the scriptures . . . . When the church does its work in this area, the recipients of this edifying instruction become inoculated to the teaching they may get from others.

Would we not be better off discussing how to assist young parents in fulfilling Ephesians 6:4?

Now you've got it . . . Teach "the parents to train up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord." Whose responsibility is it when it comes to the secular education of my sons? It's mine, not the churches.

 

Thank you for your questions and I hope that my response is taken in the spirit in which it is written.

 


Below is another post asking for help in dealing with a young man who is against eating in the church and the church support of orphan homes.

We have a young man attending that takes issue with eating in the building and helping orphan homes, (I guess in anyway). He would like to study about this. Does anybody out there have any experience with this. If so please email me any comments you may have. - Steven,

Steven,

My name is Don McClain and I am preaching for the Sixty Fifth Street church of Christ in Little Rock Arkansas. We are a "non-institutional" group - meaning that we believe that the church is sufficient to carry out the work God gave it to do without the additions of humanly devised institutions. We believe in following the Pattern as revealed in the New Testament pertaining to both the work and worship of the church - preserving the autonomy and responsibility laid upon each congregation to carry out its own work as well as emphasizing personal responsibilities that the church be not burdened that it may focus upon its primary work which is to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ that the lost may be saved and the saved remain saved. (1 Timothy 5:3-16)

I happen to agree with the young man if he is referring to the church providing social and recreational meals based upon 1 Cor. 11:22,34. This is not saying that it is absolutely wrong to eat in the building, but that it is forbidden in scripture for "the church" to engage as "a church" in social or recreational functions. Such activities are not a part of the churches work or function.

As for orphan homes, I have never met anyone that advocated that orphans should not be helped. The difference is that many, as I do, believe that the church, as a church, has not been given the authority to help orphans in general, or/and to establish another institution to provide for certain orphans. The church has a duty and responsibility to its members . . including their children, but the church has no obligation or authority to provide for orphans in general or to establish another institution to do the work God gave it to do.

Individually, Christians may help alleviate many social and/or entertainment needs as opportunity and ability permits . . . but the church is not a social club nor an entertainment center. Its work is spiritual and specialized, and when diluted and burdened with secular, and social activities it can no longer function within its given role as effectively as it should.

I encourage you to study with the young man, and investigate the issue honestly. If you would like to honestly investigate these questions with me . . I will gladly study them with you - or send material dealing with this subject. If I can help - let me know.

Sincerely, Don McClain

donmccla@msn.com


Schedule of services

Sunday morning;

Sunday Evening;

Wednesday –


Free

  • Bible correspondence courses
  • Private Bible study

Just call 1-501-568-1062 or write to the above address specifying your interest, and we will provide these things – at no cost to you!

 


If you would like to be removed from this list - please reply to donmccla@msn.com and your name will immediatley be removed.

 


Elders

George Rumker 565-5782

Louis Sharp 565-0943

Bill Wharton 821-2760

Deacons

Glen Gray 758-1301

Bennie Stephens 562-7391

Karl VanDevender 315-5464

Kevin Webb 842-3743

Brady Speer 868-3547

Evangelist

Don McClain (R) 315-1953

(Study) 568-1062



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.